Move legacy sites onto a modern stack and a real content model—add AI only where it earns its keep. Your positioning stays recognizable; the system underneath does not stay stuck.
Define types, fields, and relationships for what you sell and say. The front end reads that model—update once, reflect everywhere.
In practice
Without this
Product and message definitions live in scattered pages and files. Nothing owns the truth, so the public story drifts.
What you gain
Fewer copy-paste fixes: the stack reads one model (JSON), so the public story stays aligned when you change the data.
Map learn → compare → decide, then build the UI around that: flow and CTAs match your pitch, not a generic template.
In practice
Without this
A stock layout drives the story; differentiation gets squeezed into corners instead of the full journey.
What you gain
Proof and next steps appear in the order you actually sell—fewer dead ends.
Extend the same platform with auth, roles, and light workflows—internal views, approvals, or handoffs—so work stays where the data lives.
In practice
Without this
The marketing site is live, but ops still run through email, spreadsheets, and side apps.
What you gain
Less copying between tools; the stack supports how you run after launch, not just how you look online.
Tie guided answers to the catalog, policies, and FAQs you already maintain—so help stays accurate and approvable.
In practice
Without this
Common questions hit static pages or a queue—nothing authoritative is wired in, so answers are generic or risky.
What you gain
Faster, on-brand answers; you control what can be said and trace it to source content.
After launch, add landings, dashboards, forms, CRM handoffs, analytics, integrations, and polish—same codebase and patterns so it stays maintainable.
In practice
Without this
Every new ask becomes another plugin, vendor, or spreadsheet—small requests stack into cost and risk.
What you gain
One place to grow: new work reuses your model and UI system instead of another bolt-on each quarter.
Project Flow
Typical Project Path
Current system review
1 / 5
Step 01
Current system
Step 02
Shared model
Step 03
Build layer
Step 04
Guided help
Step 05
Stronger platform
Step 01
Start from what runs today: pages, customer path, handoffs, and workarounds. Often that means site builders, template-led storefronts, or older open-source CMS—not a bespoke content model or AI layer on structured data—then separate what still works for customers from what slows the business.
Typical stack
Step takeaway
Name the drag before you design around it.
Step 02
Define content types, relationships, and reusable sections so there is one source of truth—not the same copy edited in five places.
Typical stack
Step takeaway
Model first, then UI.
Step 03
Implement the front end and hooks—CMS, forms, analytics, systems that need to participate—against that model so publishing and routing stay coherent.
Typical stack
Step takeaway
One foundation for the site and what plugs into it.
Step 04
Add guided help or internal assistance only where content is structured enough to ground answers—so responses stay controllable and traceable.
Typical stack
Step takeaway
AI after the model, not instead of it.
Step 05
Launch: familiar to your market, but easier to update, sell through, and extend with new pages, workflows, and tools.
Step takeaway
Ship the upgrade; keep improving on the same base.
What changed
Same phases as Project Flow. Context, outcome, and a finished capture are below; open Full process for the case focus and each step in detail.
Before: WordPress-era stack
The public site (archived snapshot, Mar 2026) ran on WordPress: theme- and plugin-heavy, page-by-page edits, and product detail split across templates—slow when lines, training, or campaigns need to ship together.
Why a modern stack improves ROI
Speed and clarity lift conversion; structured content cuts publish time; typed UI and edge hosting cut breakage. One stack can add AI later—less budget on glue. New public experience: transmitter-solutions-site.vercel.app.
Scope drives cost. A full build is the usual engagement; hourly maintenance is there when you need ongoing help. Ballpark figures below are for planning—not a quote.
Full build
Scoped project
Typical range for a full rebuild; final cost depends on scope.
The primary JMP engagement: a full website rebuild and modernization scoped around your business, platform needs, and desired AI capabilities.
Full website rebuild
CMS and data architecture
UX modernization and implementation
AI-ready platform foundation
Hourly maintenance
Hourly
Billed in small increments; used as-needed after launch.
Hourly maintenance and support for updates, refinements, or ongoing technical needs after launch when they are actually required.
Hourly maintenance
Post-launch changes and fixes
Available when support is needed
Not typically required after a strong implementation
JMP is a small shop focused on full-site rebuilds: honest estimates, phased delivery, and systems your team can operate without a permanent agency on retainer.
B2B teams whose site has turned into a patchwork of plugins and one-offs—not a blank-slate vanity rebrand. If the problem is clarity, speed, and ownership, we are a fit.
Engagements are scoped in phases: what must stay recognizable, what ships first, and what can wait. Your constraints set the plan—no boilerplate roadmap deck.
We bias toward a maintainable platform you can run after launch: structured content, a modern stack, and handoff documentation that matches how your team actually works.
If that sounds like your situation, the next step is a short conversation about scope and timeline—not a sales marathon.
Start a conversationEmail us to book a short strategy call. We will respond with next steps.
